It should be noted that Woolsey uses this approach against a strong 1NT only. His weak 1NT defense includes natural penalty doubles, among other differences.
The 2-level overcalls are the same as Cappelletti, except that the meanings of the
Playing Cappelletti, overcaller might bid
In ACBL events, the Multi-Landy double and overcalls are all alertable.
Overcall | Meaning |
---|---|
Double | Varies by partnership agreement. Here is a comprehensive method outlined by David Oakley in "Multi-Landy: The Killer Defense Versus One Notrump":1
Alternatively in "The Mysterious Multi", Mark Horton and Jan van Cleef propose double as the major-minor hand type vs. strong no-trumps, and simply penalty vs. weak no-trumps.2 |
2 | At least 5-4 or 4-5 in hearts and spades; rarely 4-4. (This is the Landy aspect of the convention.) |
2 | 6 hearts or spades (rarely 5) without a side suit. (This is the Multi aspect.) |
2 | 5 hearts and a 4+ card minor. (This is the Cappelletti aspect.) |
2 | 5 spades and a 4+ card minor. (This is also the Cappelletti aspect.) |
2NT | At least 5-5 in clubs and diamonds. |
Response | Meaning |
---|---|
2 | Tolerance for both minors (at least 3-3). Asks partner to pass or correct. Partner will:
|
2 | Tolerance for both majors (at least 3-3). Asks partner to bid his major suit. Partner will:
|
2 | Natural, 6+ hearts, nonforcing. |
2 | Natural, 6+ spades, nonforcing. |
2NT | Varies by partnership agreement. According to Horton and van Cleef, this is artificial and forcing with at least 4-4 in the majors. Asks the overcaller to clarify his hand.3 Overcaller's responses are:
|
3 | Natural, 6+ good clubs, nonforcing. |
3 | Natural, 6+ good diamonds, nonforcing. |
Response | Meaning |
---|---|
Pass | Natural, 6+ good clubs, nonforcing. |
2 | Equal length in the majors. Asks partner to pick one. With 5-4 in the majors, for example, partner will correct to the 5-card major. |
2 | Natural sign-off, showing a preference for hearts even if partner is 5-4 in spades and hearts. |
2 | Natural sign-off, showing a preference for spades even if partner is 4-5 in spades and hearts. |
2NT | Varies by partnership agreement. Horton and van Cleeff propose that 2NT is strong, artificial, and forcing. Overcaller can rebid as follows.4
|
Response | Meaning |
---|---|
2 | Natural signoff if overcaller has hearts. However, this bid may also be made with game-invitational
values in spades. If overcaller corrects to |
2 | Natural signoff if overcaller has spades. However, this may also show game-invitational values in
hearts. If overcaller corrects to |
2NT | Artificial, forcing. Asks the overcaller to clarify his hand. Overcaller's responses are:
3 shows 5+ spades, maximum strength. 3 shows 5+ hearts, minimum strength. 3 shows 5+ spades, minimum strength. (Some pairs may switch the minimum and maximum meanings, but "fast arrival" seems a bit more appropriate with the weak hands.) |
Response | Meaning |
---|---|
Pass | To play. |
2 | Natural, 6+ good spades, no heart support, nonforcing. |
2NT | Artificial, no heart support, asks partner to bid his minor. |
3 | Natural, 6+ good clubs, no heart support, nonforcing. |
3 | Natural, 6+ good diamonds, no heart support, nonforcing. |
3 | Preemptive, 3+ hearts. Nonforcing. |
3 | Natural, preemptive, 6+ good spades, no heart support. Nonforcing. |
3NT | To play. |
4 | To play. |
4 | To play. |
Response | Meaning |
---|---|
Pass | To play. |
2NT | Artificial, no spade support, asks partner to bid his minor. |
3 | Natural, 6+ good clubs, no spade support, nonforcing. |
3 | Natural, 6+ good diamonds, no spade support, nonforcing. |
3 | Natural, 6+ good hearts, no spade support, nonforcing. |
3 | Preemptive, 3+ spades. Nonforcing. |
3NT | To play. |
4 | To play. |
4 | To play. |
Response | Meaning |
---|---|
3 | To play. |
3 | To play. Tends to deny club support. |
3 | Natural, 6+ good hearts, no support for either minor, nonforcing. |
3 | Natural, 6+ good spades, no support for either minor, nonforcing. |
3NT | To play. |
4 | 3+ clubs, invitational to 5. |
4 | 3+ diamonds, invitational to 5. |
4 | To play. |
4 | To play. |
What if the opponents compete over the Woolsey action? For instance:
West 1NT |
North Dbl* |
East 2-any |
South ? |
West 1NT |
North 2-any* |
East Dbl |
South ? |
West 1NT |
North 2-any* |
East 2-any |
South ? |
Response | Meaning |
---|---|
Raise of partner's suit | Natural. |
New suit | Natural. |
Double / Redouble | Showing interest in one of partner's suits, with emphasis on a major. |
2NT | Showing both minors (opposite a Woolsey double), or asking for overcaller's strength. |
West 1NT |
North Dbl |
East Redbl |
South ? |
Woolsey recommends agreeing that pass here is to play, and otherwise ignoring the redouble (i.e. bids mean the same as if East had passed). There are other things one can do of course, but it is not a bad philosophy to ignore enemy doubles and redoubles in conventional situations and have bids mean what they would have meant had the enemy passed — much easier on the memory.
Response | Meaning |
---|---|
Pass | Support for partner's minor. |
2 | Artificial relay to partner's major OR |
2 | Natural. |
The following hands come from Kit Woolsey and Bart Bramley in the 2019 Open USBC.9
Vul: E-W | Ginossar | |||
Dlr: East | A85 | |||
J73 | ||||
Woolsey | J87 | Bramley | ||
63 | T652 | KQT42 | ||
KQ95 | 864 | |||
A93 | Willenken | KT65 | ||
K873 | J97 | 4 | ||
AT2 | ||||
Q42 | ||||
AQJ9 |
Willenken 1NT1 All Pass |
Woolsey Pass |
Ginossar Pass |
Bramley Pass 2 |
Vul: E-W | Ginossar | |||
Dlr: East | AKJ3 | |||
A32 | ||||
Woolsey | A42 | Bramley | ||
QT65 | 542 | 2 | ||
KT94 | QJ87 | |||
KT7 | Willenken | J953 | ||
J8 | 9874 | KT76 | ||
65 | ||||
Q86 | ||||
AQ93 |
Willenken Pass Pass Dbl |
Woolsey Pass 22 Pass |
Ginossar 1NT1 Pass 2NT |
Bramley Pass 23 All Pass |
Vul: E-W | Ginossar | |||
Dlr: East | 6 | |||
Q62 | ||||
Woolsey | 9732 | Bramley | ||
AQJ972 | 65432 | T84 | ||
J9 | KT843 | |||
KQJ | Willenken | 654 | ||
KT | K53 | Q8 | ||
A75 | ||||
AT8 | ||||
AJ97 |
Willenken 1NT1 All Pass |
Woolsey 22 |
Ginossar Pass Pass |
Bramley Pass 23 |
Multi-Landy has a multi-generational history. It's based on the original Landy convention from the 1950s whereby a simple
echo date('Y'); ?> © Jeff Tang. All Rights Reserved.