

This approach was commonplace until the 1970s, when American expert Richard Walsh popularized his Western Scientific bidding system. With less than game-forcing strength, Walsh espoused bypassing the 
Holding 4+ diamonds and a 4-card major, responder should bid the major first. It’s important to show the major first and foremost, because responder might not have the strength to bid again.
East KQ87 T83 A9763 7 |
|
Bid 1
.
East KQ87 T832 A976 7 |
|
Bid 1
. When holding 4-4 majors, show the hearts first. You can still locate a spade fit if partner rebids
.
How "extreme" to take the Walsh philosophy is a matter of partnership agreement. For instance, some pairs might bypass 6 strong diamonds to bid 4 weak spades... and some might not.
East 7642 T7 AKQ83 54 |
|
...Do you really want to bid
?
With game-forcing strength, responder can afford to bid his diamond suit first, and rebid his major next.
East K52 AK83 KJT73 7 |
|
Bid 1
. You’re willing to reverse and show your hearts later.
Why play Walsh? First, you can find a major suit fit faster. This can be important when the opponents compete.
| North | ||||
KT3 | ||||
852 | ||||
| West | 652 | East | ||
82 | KT94 | 53 | ||
AT64 | KQ97 | |||
A4 | South | KJT93 | ||
AQJ52 | AJ9754 | 76 | ||
J3 | ||||
Q87 | ||||
83 |
|
West 1 ![]() 3 ![]() |
North Pass 3 ![]() |
East 1 ![]() 4 ![]() |
South 2 ![]() |
East bids 
.
Another ironic benefit of Walsh is the occasional chance of jamming the opponents yourself. Check out this deal:
| North | ||||
432 | ||||
J764 | ||||
| West | A65 | East | ||
QJ6 | QJ9 | A975 | ||
K82 | 53 | |||
74 | South | QJ93 | ||
AKT85 | KT8 | 762 | ||
AQT9 | ||||
KT82 | ||||
43 |
|
West 1 ![]() 1NT |
North Pass |
East 1 ![]() |
South Pass |
If East bids 


Note that in ACBL games, Walsh responses are not alertable. However, the "Frequently bypass 4+
"
When the auction begins
: 1
,

First - in his fine book "Modern Constructive Bidding", Marshall Miles advocates against opening 
Second, responder is guaranteed to bid again with a 4-card major and game-forcing values. Therefore, it’s more economical and preemptive for opener to bid 1NT directly with balanced shape.
Examples:
| North | ||||
A54 | ||||
K3 | ||||
| West | T943 | East | ||
T73 | A754 | K98 | ||
A864 | 972 | |||
AK | South | QJ752 | ||
QJ86 | QJ62 | K3 | ||
QJT5 | ||||
86 | ||||
T92 |
|
West 1 ![]() 1NT2 |
North Pass Pass |
East 1 1Pass3 |
South Pass |
|
| North | ||||
54 | ||||
K32 | ||||
| West | T943 | East | ||
T73 | A754 | AK98 | ||
A864 | 97 | |||
AK | South | QJ752 | ||
QJ86 | QJ62 | K3 | ||
QJT5 | ||||
86 | ||||
T92 |
|
West 1 ![]() 1NT2 2NT |
North Pass Pass Pass |
East 1 12 33NT |
South Pass Pass All Pass |
|
In the two auctions above, 1NT is alertable because of the ambiguity of opener's major suit length.
Note also that West could rebid 

echo date('Y'); ?> © Jeff Tang. All Rights Reserved.